Reliability Analysis of the SF-36 Questionnaire in Pregnant Population from a Region in Northern Spain

Authors

  • Cristian Mar´tín Vázquez Departamento de Enfermería y Fisioterapia. Área de Enfermería. Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud. Universidad de León. Campus de Ponferrada. Ponferrada.
  • Laura Rosón Matilla Servicio de Partos. Hospital del Bierzo. Ponferrada
  • Cristina Liébana Presa Departamento de Enfermería y Fisioterapia. Área de Enfermería. Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud. Universidad de León. Campus de Ponferrada. Ponferrada.
  • Rubén García Fernández Departamento de Enfermería y Fisioterapia. Área de Enfermería. Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud. Universidad de León. Campus de Ponferrada. Ponferrada.
  • José David Urchaga Litago Facultad de Comunicación. Universidad Pontifi cia de Salamanca. Salamanca.
  • Ascensión Galán Barrio Servicio de Partos. Hospital Universitario Lucus Augusti. Lugo.

Keywords:

Quality of Life, Nursing, Obstetric, SF-36

Abstract

Background: Quality of life during pregnancy is crucial as physiological changes can signifi cantly impact individual well-being perception. While instruments like the SF-36 exist to measure quality of life, their specific application in Spanish pregnant women has not been fully validated. The general objective focuses on examining the reliability of the SF-36 questionnaire as a tool for evaluating
quality of life in pregnant women in a northern region of Spain.
Methodology: The study recruited 300 pregnant women between weeks 8 and 36 of gestation using simple random sampling. Sociodemographic and obstetric- gynecological data were collected through a selfadministered questionnaire, including information such as age, marital status, nationality, area of residence, obstetric history, and conception method. Quality of life assessment was conducted using the SF-36 questionnaire, which examines eight dimensions of perceived health, as well as physical and mental summary components.
Results: The results showed a mean age of 33.30 years in the sample, with the majority of women being Spanish and urban residents. Regarding obstetric variables, most pregnancies were spontaneous, and about a third had experienced previous miscarriages. Mean scores on the SF-36 dimensions varied, with physical functioning scoring the highest and vitality and role physical scoring the lowest. In terms of reliability, the SF-36 questionnaire obtained a Cronbach’s alpha score of 0.90 and a McDonald’s omega score of 0.97. Dimension-wise analysis revealed scores above 0.74 in all dimensions, except for the social functioning dimension (0.60).

Conclusions: The SF-36 demonstrated high reliability in assessing quality of life during pregnancy across all dimensions and summary components, except for social functioning. Exploration of alternative instruments for this area is suggested, alongside further promotion of research in the fi eld.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

The World Health Organization quality of life assessment (WHOQOL): Position paper from the World Health Organization. Soc Sci Med. 1995 Nov 1;41(10):1403–9.

Casarin ST, Barboza MCN, De Siqueira HCH. Quality of life in pregnancy: literature systematic review. Revista de Enfermagem UFPE on line. 2010 May 17;4(3):1046.

Rondung E, Oliveira S, Esteves F. Validity and reliability of the WHOQOL-BREF in a pregnant population. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2023 Dec 1;21(1).

Heron J, O’Connor TG, Evans J, Golding J, Glover V. The course of anxiety and depression through pregnancy and the postpartum in a community sample. J Affect Disord [Internet]. 2004 May [cited 2023 Dec 1];80(1):65–73. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15094259/

Ferrans CE, Zerwic JJ, Wilbur JE, Larson JL. Conceptual model of health-related quality of life. J Nurs Scholarsh [Internet]. 2005 Dec [cited 2024 Feb 2];37(4):336–42. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16396406/

Harper A, Power M, Orley J, Herrman H, Schofi eld H, Murphy B, et al. Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment. The WHOQOL Group. Psychol Med [Internet]. 1998 May [cited 2024 Feb 2];28(3):551–8. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9626712/

Balestroni G, Bertolotti G. EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D): an instrument for measuring quality of life. Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease [Internet]. 2015 Dec 1 [cited 2024 Feb 2];78(3):155–9. Available from: https://www.monaldi-archives.org/index.php/macd/article/view/121

Burckhardt CS, Anderson KL. The Quality of Life Scale (QOLS): Reliability, validity, and utilization. Health Qual Life Outcomes [Internet].

Oct 23 [cited 2024 Feb 2];1(1):1–7. Available from: https://hqlo.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1477-7525-1-60

Brekke M, Berg RC, Amro A, Glavin K, Haugland T. Quality of Life instruments and their psychometric properties for use in parents during pregnancy and the postpartum period: a systematic scoping review. Health Qual Life Outcomes [Internet]. 2022 Dec 1 [cited 2024 Jan 25];20(1):107. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35810315/

Bhatia P, Chhabra S. Physiological and anatomical changes of pregnancy: Implications for anaesthesia. Vol. 62, Indian Journal of Anaesthesia. Indian Society of Anaesthetists; 2018. p. 651–7.

Carrillo-Mora P, García-Franco A, Soto-Lara M, Rodríguez-Vásquez G, Pérez-Villalobos J, Martínez-Torres D, et al. Cambios fi siológicos durante

el embarazo normal. 2021 [cited 2023 Nov6];64. Available from: http://doi.org/10.22201/fm.24484865e.2021.64.1.07

Soma-Pillay P, Nelson-Piercy C, Tolppanen H, Mebazaa A. Physiological changes in pregnancy. Cardiovasc J Afr. 2016 Mar 1;27(2):89–94.

Martín-Vázquez C, García-Fernández R, Calvo-Ayuso N, Martínez-Fernández MC, Liébana-Presa C, Urchaga-Litago JD. Health-Related Quality of Life in Pregnant Women during the First Trimester in Northern Spain: A Descriptive Cross-Sectional Study. Healthcare (Basel) [Internet]. 2023 May 14 [cited 2023 Jun 1];11(10):1424. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37239710/

Navas A, Carrascosa MDC, Artigues C, Ortas S, Portells E, Soler A, et al. Effectiveness of Moderate-Intensity Aerobic Water Exercise during Pregnancy on Quality of Life and Postpartum Depression: A Multi-Center, Randomized Controlled Trial. J Clin Med [Internet]. 2021 Jun 1 [cited 2023 Dec 1];10(11):10. Available from: /pmc/articles/PMC8198819/

Vázquez Lara JM, Rodríguez Díaz L, Ramírez Rodrigo J, Villaverde Gutiérrez C, Torres Luque G, Gómez-Salgado J. Calidad de vida relacionada con la salud en una población de gestantes sanas tras un programa de actividad física en el medio acuático (PAFMAE). Rev Esp Salud Publica. 2017;91.

Alonso Domínguez FJ, Regidor Poyatos E, Barrio Anta G, Prieto Lastra L, Rodríguez C, Fuente de Hoz L de la. Valores poblacionales de referencia de la versión española del Cuestionario de Salud SF-36. Medicina clínica, ISSN 0025-7753, Vol 111, No 11, 1998, págs 416-416 [Internet]. 1998 [cited 2024 Feb 2];111(11):416–416. Available from: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=9080105

Espinosa de los Monteros MJ, Alonso J, Ancochea J, González A. [Quality of life in asthma: reliability and validity of the short form generic questionnaire (SF-36) applied to the population of asthmatics in a public health area]. Arch Bronconeumol [Internet]. 2002 [cited 2024 Feb 2];38(1):4–9. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11809130/

Gomez-Besteiro MI, Santiago-Pérez MI, Alonso-Hernández Á, Valdés-Cañedo F, Rebollo-Álvarez P. Validity and reliability of the SF-36 questionnaire in patients on the waiting list for a kidney transplant and transplant patients. Am J Nephrol [Internet]. 2004 [cited 2024 Feb 2];24(3):346–51. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15205553/

Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item shortform health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care [Internet]. 1992 [cited 2023 Jan 26];30(6):473–83. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1593914/

McHorney CA, Ware JE, Raczek AE. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Med Care [Internet]. 1993 [cited 2023 Jan 26];31(3):247–63. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8450681/

Ware J, Snoww K, Kosinski M, Gandek B. SF36 Health Survey: Manual and Interpretation Guide. Lincoln [Internet]. 1993 [cited 2023 Jan 26];30.

Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/247503121_SF36_Health_Survey_Manual_and_Interpretation_Guide

Ware JE, Kosinski M, Gandek B, Aaronson NK, Apolone G, Bech P, et al. The Factor Structure of the SF-36 Health Survey in 10 Countries: Results from the IQOLA Project. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51(11):1159–65.

Alonso J, Prieto L, Antó JM. La versión española del SF-36 Health Survey (Cuestionario de Salud SF-36): un instrumento para la medida de los resultados clínicos. Med Clin (Barc) [Internet]. 1995 Jan 1 [cited 2024 Feb 2];0(104):771–6. Available from: https://portalrecerca.uab.cat/en/publications/laversi%C3%B3n-espa%C3%B1ola-del-sf-36-healthsurvey-cuestionario-de-salud-2

Vilagut G, Ferrer M, Rajmil L, Rebollo P, Permanyer-Miralda G, Quintana JM, et al. El Cuestionario de Salud SF-36 español: una década de experiencia y nuevos desarrollos por los investigadores de la Red-IRYSS*. Gac Sanit. 2005;19(2):135–50.

Tavakol M, Dennick R. Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. Int J Med Educ [Internet]. 2011 [cited 2024 May 6];2:53–5. Available from: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0

Alzboon G, Vural G. Factors infl uencing the quality of life of healthy pregnant women in north Jordan. Medicina (Lithuania). 2019 Jun 1;55(6).

Li J, Mao J, Du Y, Morris JL, Gong G, Xiong X. Healthrelated quality of life among pregnant women with and without depression in Hubei, China. Matern Child Health J. 2012 Oct;16(7):1355–63.

Rezaeiniaraki M, Roosta S, Alimoradi Z, Allen KA, Pakpour AH. The association between social capital and quality of life among a sample of Iranian pregnant women. BMC Public Health [Internet]. 2019 Nov 9 [cited 2024 May 6];19(1):1–8. Available from: https://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12889-019-7848-0

Kugahara T, Ohashi K. Characteristics of nausea and vomiting in pregnant Japanese women. Nurs Health Sci. 2006 Sep;8(3):179–84.

Published

2025-08-26

How to Cite

Mar´tín Vázquez, C., Rosón Matilla, L., Liébana Presa, C., García Fernández, R., Urchaga Litago, J. D., & Galán Barrio, A. (2025). Reliability Analysis of the SF-36 Questionnaire in Pregnant Population from a Region in Northern Spain. Revista Enfermeir@s, 2(43), 66–72. Retrieved from https://www.enfermerialugo.org/revista/index.php/enfermeiraos/article/view/72